Shetland's
FIRST daily
newspaper

The Shetland News - Shetland's Daily Internet News Magazine

Read all
around the
world, daily

SIC shouldn't pay for Scatsta

 

19 April, 2007

WHILST out door stopping this week, in addition to the proposed wind farm and the Bressay Bridge, the £8 million hand out to the oil industry was the hottest issue which I was confronted with by those I spoke to. Initially I wanted to give the SLAP directors (all SIC councillors) the benefit of the doubt about this supposed investment but the more folk I spoke to and the more people that raised it made me think that maybe I was missing something.

According to the press report £8 million has been loaned to the oil industry to build a new terminal and make other improvements to Scatsta. This is the same industry which is currently getting $67 a barrel and where operators such as Exxon, Shell and BP posted record profits in the 10s of billions each last year. Yet they have to come for a loan from a community of 22,000 folks?

Let's be clear about this. This was, of course, nothing to do with the threat of them pulling out of Scatsta to Aberdeen or Sumburgh or to protect the reportedly 100 jobs associated with the airport. This is a wise investment for SLAP who will, if they are to believed, get a return on this investment within the six year time frame the oil industry has guaranteed to stay at Scatsta. I am sure that SLAP has some cast iron guarantee that should the operators pull out of Scatsta before the six years that there will be a clause inserted in the agreement for all this cash to be repaid!

Now I will let you do the sums yourselves as you don't have to be a chartered accountant to figure out that £8 million divided by six is a lot of cash, which I presume will be recouped by increased rent and landing
changes. But under confidentiality clauses (that is another issue) I am sure we will never get this kind of information so can never make up our minds whether this is a wise investment on our behalf or not. Remember this is not a commercial bank we are talking about but money which, ironically, came
from the oil industry and which is supposed to be used for the benefit of all of Shetland.

This of course can be compared to the level playing field of the SIC contribution, in kind - honestly no cash was offered in any form - of £900,000 (about 10 per cent of the Scatsta loan) to the Sumburgh runway
extension.

Being a strong supporter of rural communities and recognising the valuable role that Scatsta plays in the north mainland (even some south mainland people work there) I have never had a problem with Shetland having a second airport at Scatsta. But if the oil industry wants one there it should pay for it. Simple really?

Rick Nickerson
Independent Candidate for Shetland South Ward 5
Ringan, Ireland, Bigton
nickerson@ringan.shetland.co.uk

 

Advertisements

Advertise with The Shetland News

 
ARCHIVE
HOME

Most recent update - Friday, 26 February 2010 11:43

All content Copyright © 2003-2010 Shetland News Agency
This website is financed entirely privately, with no grants, subsidies or public money

Please see our disclaimer
SHETLAND NEWS
HOME