Shetland's
FIRST daily
newspaper

The Shetland News - Shetland's Daily Internet News Magazine

Read all
around the
world, daily

Character assassination

 

1 April, 2008

IT’S ALWAYS entertaining to watch a creative genius at work: in his latest effort Stuart Dobson does not disappoint.

To his first charge I’m proud to plead “guilty”. At a series of public meetings last year about the Viking Energy windfarm proposal I was indeed asked by the council (not by Viking Energy) to act as an independent chairman. In that capacity I repeatedly had to ask Mr Dobson to stop making angry, insinuating remarks about the motives and character of Viking Energy staff and to confine himself to factual questions about what was actually proposed. He appeared determined to see the public consultation as a conspiracy to deceive the public and to silence him, whereas my brief was to ensure that residents of the areas where the meetings were held had priority in asking questions and making contributions to the debate.

Mr Dobson will recall that when at last we reached his home island of Yell I immediately offered him the floor and as much time as he wished to make his criticisms. As I recall, all he did was repeat unfounded allegations he’d made at earlier meetings. I’m sorry Mr Dobson thinks I wasn’t independent enough but I’m sure Viking Energy’s staff don’t feel I “orchestrated their case” by insisting that questioners received detailed replies. In fact I believe I made life quite difficult for them for the best part of a month.

As for the second charge (or, rather, sneer), that I was, in effect, the evil genius who concocted this entire conspiracy, I fear Mr Dobson’s grip on reality has deserted him: I was only the editor of the 'Windylights' publication last year. There were several authors. My job, for which I was paid a fee (check my SIC declaration of interests, Mr Dobson), was to collate the various contributions, condense a very long text into plain language and a consistent style and, most importantly, to check the authors' facts. This led to some fairly heated exchanges with Viking Energy and Scottish and Southern Energy. I like to think the result was worth it because, after this fairly rigorous procedure, the first edition of ‘Windylights’, although not perfect, was as accurate as I could make it at that time.

The idea, which is clearly anathema to some people, was that the public would be able to base their opinions on facts rather than rumour, suspicion and fearful fantasy: nothing like as entertaining as Mr Dobson’s lurid scenarios, but a damn sight more use if we’re to make informed judgments about the biggest project in Shetland since the building of Sullom Voe.

Mr Dobson’s detailed notes should tell him that at all the public meetings I chaired, I declared my personal point of view: while I was in favour of earning money for the Shetland community by exporting wind-powered electricity to the UK mainland, I thought the initial proposal was too big. I still think that and I await with interest the revised edition of ‘Windylights’, which will detail the changes Viking Energy Ltd has made in response to the criticisms received last year. I don’t know exactly what the changes are yet because in February this year I declined Viking Energy’s offer of a contract to edit the second ‘Windylights’. The reason I turned down this work (and did myself out of a modest fee) was that by then I was a candidate in a council by-election and thought there might be a conflict of interest, were I to be elected. I’m not sure how Mr Dobson will work this damning piece of evidence into his plot but I’m sure he’ll have a go. After all, having a go is what he does best.

He says I’m sympathetic to Viking Energy. Well, I do sympathise with them in that, having tried their best to carry out an honest and open public consultation, they still find their motives impugned in Mr Dobson’s disgraceful personal attacks.

When Mr Dobson has been in Shetland a little longer he may come to understand that most people in these islands like to listen carefully to both sides of a story before reaching a considered opinion. They generally do not approve of character assassination as an analytical tool.

Yours sincerely,

Jonathan Wills
Independent councillor for Lerwick South
jonathan.wills@shetland.gov.uk
Sundside
Bressay

 

Advertisements

Advertise with The Shetland News

 
ARCHIVE
HOME

Most recent update - Friday, 26 February 2010 11:43

All content Copyright © 2003-2010 Shetland News Agency
This website is financed entirely privately, with no grants, subsidies or public money

Please see our disclaimer
SHETLAND NEWS
HOME