The Shetland News - Shetland's Daily Internet News Magazine Please enable Java to see this advert
  Shetland News Home PageShetland News - LettersShetland News - Opinion and CommentShetland News - FeaturesShetland News - Shetland and Lerwick Weather informationShetland News - Search the Shetland News and its archivesShetland News - Contact Us  
Shetland News - ClassifiedsShetland News - Job OpportunitiesShetland News - Recommended WWW LinksShetland News - Archives
Latest News Headlines:- Please enable Java to see this advert
Tesco/Mareel, same rules apply
 

2 July, 2008

I NOTE the frequently expressed concern regarding the impending opening of that trading anti-christ, Tesco.

I agree entirely that it is highly probable, nay, inevitable, that traders operating on Shetland, both indigenous and branches of national chains, will experience a change in market conditions when this new and indeed powerful entity is unleashed upon the local scene.

Of course if everyone on Shetland boycotts Tesco then things will stay pretty much as they are. The current traders will see no adverse effect on their turnover. The Co-op will thrive as it has done for the last six weeks or so.

Boots didn't cause Laings to shut down. Mackays didn't close Aspects or Smiths, nor indeed did Bodens, M & S Online or Next, although I am sure that they have had an increasing impact over the last five years. Amazon will have doubtless affected the Shetland Times bookshop and any number of online electrical/photographic retailers will have caused concern and change to The Camera Shop(s), Bolts, Frank Williamsons etc. Clive continues to operate despite Play.com, CDWow and HMV Online. And yes, of course there have been trading casualties - Televiradio, Viking Computers and many others besides.

But then that's the nature of commerce. Those who sell to the public must compete for their clients in an ever-changing marketplace. 'Twas ever thus, even in my own field of operations.

Some years ago, concern was expressed by many bar/hotel operators about the effect Clickimin would have on their operations, with its bars and multiple food outlets. It has been integrated and has itself changed this aspect of its operation fairly dramatically since its opening. In the intervening decade(s) we have seen many hospitality (bar/restaurant) enterprises open and several close. Who decided which would succeed and which would fail?

You did.

I doubt if anyone will be able to suggest that Tesco's business plan is not “robust". Methinks, indeed, that this is perhaps the problem. It is feared that Tesco will flourish - but at the expense of others. But then, I repeat myself, that's the nature of commerce. And who will decide if Tesco is to flourish?

You will.

If the citizens of Shetland cross the portal into that fresh, hallowed, selling ground and are tempted by its shiny wares, then free market forces will have expressed themselves in this democracy in which we live. Tesco will have, as is their right, invested their wealth, risked their money and will reap reward or failure accordingly. We will have choices to make about what and where we buy and we will make them.

In the area of hospitality I have already mentioned the Clickimin event of some years ago. Since then, we have seen many publicly funded forays into this area - Bonhoga, Hays Dock at the Museum and soon Mareel with its exceptionally busy food and drink operation - £400,000 per annum is touted I believe.

Of course, if Tesco fail, it’s their money that's lost and their money that has to pay its running costs regardless.

But people's concern isn't about what will happen to poor old Tesco if they fail, it’s about the effect on other businesses when Tesco succeed. Spare a thought therefore about where the £400,000 isn't being spent when it’s spent at Mareel. In an era of economic slowdown, it’s not new money, it’s someone else's present turnover (and that includes Hay's Dock).

If it's considered wrong for a private investor to promote a new enterprise if it might affect the viability of existing businesses, then why is it right for a publicly funded one to do just that? Also, Tesco isn't really very new, it's just a brand change.

I happen to believe that Tesco has a right, should its shareholders wish it, to invest in new ventures as it sees fit. And I also believe that Shetland Island Council has the same right, should it's "shareholders" so wish it.

Tesco invests/risks Tesco's money, the SIC invests/risks ours. The council's decision is harder in that it must also consider the non-financial benefits, the social advantages which will accrue from its investments. Tough job, no question.

I love cinema, music, good food and wine and (shame on me) I love commerce. I hate prejudice, bigotry and hypocrisy. Please let the Tesco goose and the Mareel gander be judged by the same rules.

Joe Rocks
Busta House Hotel
reservations@bustahouse.com

 

Advertisements

Advertise with The Shetland News

 


 
What is
the Shetland News worth to you?

Shetland News Home PageShetland News - LettersShetland News - Opinion and CommentShetland News - FeaturesShetland News - Shetland and Lerwick Weather informationShetland News - Search the Shetland News and its archivesShetland News - Contact Us
Shetland News - ClassifiedsShetland News - Job OpportunitiesShetland News - Recommended WWW LinksShetland News - Archives

Most recent update - Friday, 05 September 2008 10:12
All content Copyright © 2003-2008 Shetland News Agency
This website is financed entirely privately, with no grants, subsidies or public money
Please see our Advertising Rates and also take note of our disclaimer
Website design and management by Force 10